Identify the exact machine and weighing positions
Use the machine serial, controller identity, head number and installed configuration. A generic record that cannot be tied to the actual instrument is weak evidence.
Separate zero checks, routine verification, calibration, adjustment and finished-pack control so each result has a clear purpose and record.
Calibration establishes the relationship between indicated value and a known reference under stated conditions. Routine verification checks whether the system remains within an agreed acceptance limit. Adjustment changes the instrument response. Finished-pack control is a separate production check and may use a checkweigher or sampling plan. The approved machine instructions, competent personnel and the site's legal and quality obligations determine the method.
| Term | Practical meaning | Evidence to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Zero check | Confirms that an unloaded weighing position returns to the expected zero condition | Date, operator, machine/head identity and result |
| Routine verification | Checks performance against a defined reference and acceptance limit without assuming an adjustment is required | Reference used, result, tolerance, environmental condition and action |
| Calibration | Establishes the relationship between the indication and known reference values under documented conditions | Procedure, references, results, uncertainty or traceability information where applicable |
| Adjustment | Changes the system so its response is brought back towards the required condition | Authorised change, before/after evidence, person responsible and follow-up verification |
| Finished-pack check | Measures the completed pack, including tare and any transfer losses after the weigher | Pack sequence, tare method, target, results, rejects and corrective action |
Use the machine serial, controller identity, head number and installed configuration. A generic record that cannot be tied to the actual instrument is weak evidence.
Reference weights and any independent check scale should be appropriate for the load, required decision and internal quality system. Keep their identification and status with the record.
Record whether the machine is clean, isolated from product contact, stable, free from mechanical interference and in the approved test mode. Vibration, contact or residue can invalidate the result.
State the permitted result, who may adjust the machine, when production must stop and how finished packs are assessed after corrective work.
After verification or adjustment, review representative finished packs and the line sequence. A successful static check does not by itself prove the whole packing process.
GOV.UK states that equipment used to weigh or measure packaged goods must be suitable, and that packers using the average system must keep records of sample-batch results. The multihead weigher setup, any independent checking equipment and the production sampling method should therefore be reviewed together. Local Trading Standards can advise on suitability for the specific business and product.
Keep the sample-batch results, the method used, the equipment identity, any corrective action and the period required by the applicable rules. The record must be clear enough to show how compliance was assessed.
The finished pack also includes tare variation and anything lost, retained or added after the dose leaves the weigher. A downstream checkweigher or controlled sample method verifies the completed pack.
There is no responsible universal interval. Use the approved machine documentation, risk assessment, quality system, duty, product, environment, fault history and any legal or customer requirement to set the check and calibration plan.
Operators may perform only the approved routine checks for which they are trained and authorised. Calibration, adjustment, repair or legal verification may require a technician, metrology specialist or other competent person.
The approved procedure should identify which heads, loads and system checks are required. A system-level result can hide a fault in one position, while head-level checks alone may not prove finished-pack performance.
Follow the site's documented escalation: stop or contain affected production where required, identify the cause, authorise any adjustment or repair, repeat the verification and assess product made since the last acceptable check.
No. A checkweigher monitors finished packs; it does not replace the approved checks on the multihead weigher or reference equipment. The two systems provide different evidence.
Send the machine identity, target weights, recent verification records, ordered finished-pack data, product batch, feeder settings, fault history and any checkweigher or sample method used.
Send the installed configuration, product, targets and current weight evidence.
Discuss the verification plan